Steve Neavling
@MCmuckraker
·
125d
The statement criticizes the Attorney General (AG) for allegedly failing to deliver justice in the Flint Water Crisis while bringing charges against individuals involved in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. It accuses the AG of attempting to silence dissent and calls for adherence to the Constitution. The tone is accusatory and impassioned, aiming to highlight perceived injustices and advocate for students' rights.
- The statement does not directly incite harm but uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory. It does not explicitly strive to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make strong accusations against the AG, which could be seen as disrespectful.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy for the victims of the Flint Water Crisis and the students charged, but its accusatory tone may undermine this effort.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the AG but does so in a manner that could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to raise awareness about perceived injustices, but the tone and approach may not be seen as responsible or with integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.