Gary Marcus

The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to OpenAI's practices and their impact on the public and educational sectors. The conversation involves a critique of OpenAI's release strategy and its implications, which are relevant to public concerns about transparency, accessibility, and the ethical use of AI technology.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual response to a press report. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a factual dialogue.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue. It addresses a factual inaccuracy without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement implicitly acknowledges a mistake by clarifying a previous misunderstanding based on a press report. [+1]
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to clarify a public issue, contributing to the betterment of public understanding. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]