Gary Marcus

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 79
9/12/2024, 6:10:14 PM
X
In reply to:
Pablo
@PeteyPabshnick
·
245d
@GaryMarcus @polynoamial how the hell do you know what it could do after running inference for 6 months
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
245d
Dear @polynoamial of OpenAI, re your new o1 model,

I really like a lot of your work, but tweet below rubs me the wrong way, because it invites the inference that running versions of o1 for weeks or months might create a new cancer drug (in reality, at best you just get new…
Noam Brown
@polynoamial
·
245d
@OpenAI @rao2z @OpenAI's o1 thinks for seconds, but we aim for future versions to think for hours, days, even weeks. Inference costs will be higher, but what cost would you pay for a new cancer drug? For breakthrough batteries? For a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis? AI can be more than chatbots

The statement 'call me when you tried it' is a dismissive and somewhat confrontational response to a question about the capabilities of an AI model after running inference for an extended period. The tone is informal and dismissive, which may not contribute constructively to the ongoing technical discussion about AI capabilities and their potential applications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The dismissive tone does not strive to do no harm and could be seen as undermining the seriousness of the discussion. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it dismisses the previous comment without engaging constructively. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the concerns raised without addressing them substantively. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and could be seen as a personal attack or dismissive comment rather than a substantive response. [-1]