Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 48

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the topic of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and the reactions of the community to different opinions on the matter. The tone is somewhat confrontational and implies a double standard in how different individuals' statements are received.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a sense of unfair treatment, which could foster divisiveness. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but hints at a form of cyberbullying or harassment by mentioning 'fan boys' attacking, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, and instead highlights a perceived bias or inconsistency in reactions. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and instead makes a personal attack on the 'fan boys'. [-1]