In reply to:
Leon Lang
@Lang__Leon
ยท
275d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
ยท
275d
The statement 'twice no less' by @Lang__Leon is a brief and somewhat ambiguous response to @GaryMarcus's acknowledgment of the new AI model's impressiveness. The context involves a discussion about the capabilities and limitations of OpenAI's new o1 model series. The statement itself does not provide substantial engagement with the public issue at hand, which is the evaluation of the AI model's performance and its implications. Therefore, it does not constitute public discourse.
- The statement does no harm but also does not contribute positively.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity but does not engage deeply.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement does not use influence for societal betterment.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement does not uphold free speech principles in a meaningful way.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.