Gary Marcus

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 63
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
277d
From the blog etc o1/strawberry is not a robust advance on general purpose reasoning.

Doesn’t sound like much of a cure for hallucinations or stupid errors, either.

A better ladder will not get us to the moon.

I want us to get to the moon.
9/12/2024, 7:50:08 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
277d
From the blog etc o1/strawberry is not a robust advance on general purpose reasoning.

Doesn’t sound like much of a cure for hallucinations or stupid errors, either.

A better ladder will not get us to the moon.

I want us to get to the moon.
Seán Ó hÉigeartaigh
@S_OhEigeartaigh
·
277d
@GaryMarcus I get that you've been interacting with unrealistic fanboys, but this feels like it's setting the bar incredibly high. Steady incremental progress stacks up, and over the course of years it's been *very* impressive.

The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of advancements in artificial intelligence, specifically addressing the progress and limitations of a particular AI model referred to as 'o1' or 'Strawberry'. The conversation involves a critique of the model's capabilities and a discussion on the nature of incremental progress in AI development.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a technical critique and part of a broader discussion on AI advancements.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a technical discussion which can be seen as promoting understanding within the context of AI development.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue. It does not involve personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but rather focuses on the technical aspects of the AI model. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a relevant public issue in AI development. [+1]