Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
9/12/2024, 8:42:27 PM
X
In reply to:
Colin Fraser
@colin_fraser
·
303d
@GaryMarcus @mealreplacer Not if they don’t give me access to it I can’t
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
303d
@mealreplacer $5 says @colin_fraser can break it by morning. but more than that, solving specific puzzles that have been widely commented on is not really the best test.
Julian
@mealreplacer
·
303d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
424d
Someday my children will ask me why anyone ever took seriously the thought that systems like this had anything to do with AGI.

I honestly have no idea how I will answer. Mass delusion?

(Example emailed to me by a friend.)

The statement in question is part of a conversation about access to a specific feature of a software product (ChatGPT o1-preview). The conversation includes a critique of the software's performance in solving a puzzle, which touches on broader discussions about artificial general intelligence (AGI). However, the specific statement about access to the feature does not substantively engage with public issues or contribute to civic dialogue. It is more of a customer service or product access query.

  1. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]