In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
ยท
308d
The statement and the accompanying image are part of a public discourse about the capabilities and limitations of OpenAI's new o1 model. The tone of the statement is somewhat defensive and dismissive, referring to critics as 'fan boys' and suggesting they read another person's take before criticizing. The intent appears to be to preemptively defend the author's position by aligning it with another respected opinion. The content is focused on the performance and limitations of the AI model, which is a substantive topic in the field of AI and technology.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses a dismissive and somewhat confrontational tone ('fan boys'). This could be seen as disrespectful and not conducive to a constructive dialogue.ย [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it uses a derogatory term ('fan boys') which could be considered cyberbullying or harassment.ย [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a defensive stance and uses dismissive language.ย [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It preempts criticism by aligning with another opinion rather than addressing potential criticisms directly and respectfully.ย [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.