In reply to:
Ian Miles Cheong
@stillgray
·
126d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
126d
The statement by @stillgray, 'Wait, I am not saying the stories are true! There is no conclusive evidence that they are. That was not my point at all,' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to Haitian mass migration and the associated narratives. The tone is defensive and aims to clarify a previous point, indicating an attempt to correct a potential misunderstanding.
- The statement strives to do no harm by clarifying that there is no conclusive evidence for the stories, which helps prevent the spread of potentially harmful misinformation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the intent behind the previous message, which can foster empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a misunderstanding without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges a potential mistake by clarifying the intent and correcting any misinterpretation. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by addressing a public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.