Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement addresses the public issue of how AI systems are perceived and marketed, making it a part of public discourse. The tone is critical and aims to clarify misconceptions about AI technology.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It aims to clarify a misconception, which can be seen as beneficial. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by explaining the nature of AI systems. However, it could be more empathetic and compassionate in its delivery. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of how AI is marketed. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to inform the public about AI technology. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.