New York Times World
@nytimesworld
·
125d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages substantively with the issue of U.S. military aid to Egypt and its implications for human rights. The tone is critical and the intent is to call attention to and challenge the policy decision of waiving human rights requirements for military aid.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for a policy that respects human rights and condemns support for human rights abusers. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on policy and actions rather than personal attacks. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the plight of political prisoners and human rights abuses. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of U.S. policy without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for the betterment of society by calling for ethical foreign policy decisions. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a significant public issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.