Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement encourages people to watch an interview with a Green Party candidate to understand the differences between the Green Party and the Democrats. It suggests that the Green Party candidates have a deep understanding and intellectual approach to the issues, which implies a substantive engagement with public issues and contributes to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not use harmful language and promotes an informative action, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging viewers to learn more about a political candidate's views, which aligns with promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the intellectual approach of the Green Party candidates, which aligns with constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By encouraging viewers to educate themselves on political differences, the statement uses influence for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by promoting informed civic engagement. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.