Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Keith Edwards
@keithedwards
·
489d
The statement criticizes the focus on personal attacks over substantive policy discussions, particularly in the context of social media interactions. It defends Jill Stein's contributions and calls out the other party for engaging in what it perceives as unproductive behavior.
- The statement aims to highlight a problem with social media discourse, which can be seen as an attempt to do no harm by advocating for more meaningful conversations. However, it does use the word 'nasty,' which could be seen as slightly aggressive. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It criticizes behavior rather than attacking the individual personally. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by defending Jill Stein's focus on policy issues, although it could be more constructive in its criticism. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out the issue with focusing on insults rather than policy. However, calling the behavior 'nasty' could be seen as a minor personal attack.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to advocate for more substantive public discourse, which is responsible and aligns with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.