Rashida Tlaib

Rank 6 of 47
|
Score 175

The statement criticizes the Attorney General (AG) for allegedly failing to deliver justice in the Flint Water Crisis while bringing charges against individuals involved in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. It accuses the AG of attempting to silence dissent and calls for adherence to the Constitution. The tone is accusatory and impassioned, aiming to highlight perceived injustices and advocate for students' rights.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly incite harm but uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory. It does not explicitly strive to do no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make strong accusations against the AG, which could be seen as disrespectful.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy for the victims of the Flint Water Crisis and the students charged, but its accusatory tone may undermine this effort.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes personal attacks against the AG, which constitutes an ad hominem argument. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to advocate for justice and students' rights, which can be seen as an attempt to better society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by criticizing the AG and advocating for constitutional rights, but its tone and approach may not be entirely responsible or with integrity.