Reposted by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
The statement addresses a public issue, specifically the potential conflict of interest among members of Congress who own stock in defense contractors. The tone is critical and calls for action, urging Congress to divest from stocks to prevent such conflicts of interest.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but its strong language could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does call out members of Congress in a general sense.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of a perceived issue, but it lacks empathy and compassion in its delivery. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more accusatory and does not invite discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to call for societal change, specifically in the realm of government ethics and financial transparency. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to address a public concern, but the tone could be more responsible and measured. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.