Gary Marcus

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 108

The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing the relationship between Silicon Valley and government regulation, specifically highlighting concerns about regulatory capture and the influence of tech leaders on government policy. The tone is critical and suggests a need for increased skepticism and caution in government dealings with tech leaders.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to do no harm by advocating for caution and skepticism, which can be seen as a protective measure for public interest. It does not engage in harmful rhetoric. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals involved, focusing on the broader issue of regulatory capture rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting a potential issue of public concern, encouraging readers to consider the implications of close relationships between tech leaders and government officials. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing a perceived issue in government regulation without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about a significant public issue, potentially contributing to the betterment of society by advocating for more cautious and skeptical government oversight. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses its platform responsibly to discuss a matter of public interest with integrity. [+1]