Amanda Askell
@AmandaAskell
·
317d
The statement and the referenced conversation constitute public discourse as they engage with the public issue of AI safety, a significant societal concern.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It raises a concern about AI safety, which is a legitimate public issue. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the importance of addressing AI safety proactively. It aligns with the principle of promoting understanding and compassion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the 'not now' view of AI safety without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It maintains a respectful tone. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By discussing AI safety, the statement uses influence for the betterment of society, aiming to prevent potential future harm. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss an important issue with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.