Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 114
9/13/2024, 2:14:27 PM
X
In reply to:
Phil Libin
@plibin
路
322d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk It鈥檚 so alpha it refuses to play by anyone else鈥檚 rules.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
322d
馃ぃ @elonmusk thinks we will have AGI better than all humans next year, and the latest model can鈥檛 even follow the rules of chess.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
322d
One of my (easier) benchmarks over the last couple years has been the ability of chatbots to play chess without illegal moves.

Looks like @Kasparov63鈥檚 still got nothing to worry about it.

The statement 'Well then we should totally put in charge of our nukes' is a sarcastic response to a discussion about the limitations of AI, specifically in the context of playing chess. The tone is critical and dismissive, suggesting that if AI cannot handle simple tasks like following the rules of chess, it should not be trusted with more serious responsibilities like managing nuclear weapons.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but the sarcasm could be seen as dismissive and not conducive to constructive dialogue.聽[-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of those involved in the conversation, as it uses sarcasm to undermine their points.聽[-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism through sarcasm.聽[-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it uses sarcasm, which can be seen as a form of personal attack.聽[-1]