In reply to:
Garry Kasparov
@Kasparov63
·
334d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the development and trustworthiness of AI, particularly in the context of machine intelligence and AGI (Artificial General Intelligence). The tone is respectful and constructive, aiming to contribute to the dialogue on how to improve AI systems.
- The statement strives to do no harm and focuses on constructive criticism of current AI approaches, suggesting an alternative path for improvement. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the complexity of AI development and the need for trustworthy systems. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on the technical aspects of AI development. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to advocate for better AI practices, contributing positively to the discourse on AI development. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.