Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public figures and political issues, contributing to the civic dialogue. The tone is highly critical and accusatory, targeting specific individuals with strong language.
- The statement violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions by using inflammatory and accusatory language. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others by engaging in personal attacks and potentially defamatory language. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it fosters division and hostility. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism and dialogue, opting for personal attacks and ad hominem arguments instead. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so irresponsibly and without integrity, given the harsh and accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.