Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Armand Domalewski
@ArmandDoma
·
488d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of political figures' financial investments and their implications. The tone is accusatory and defensive, aiming to discredit critics by highlighting their alleged support for harmful actions while defending Jill Stein's investment choices.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses inflammatory language ('literally supporting genocide') to attack critics, which can escalate tensions and harm public dialogue. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it engages in personal attacks and uses harsh language. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on attacking critics rather than fostering constructive dialogue. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments rather than addressing the substantive issues. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.