Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -115

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant political issue, specifically the actions and policies of a public figure (AOC) and their implications for international relations and human rights. The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting that AOC's actions are contradictory to her stated positions and harmful to Palestinians.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses strong language ('genocidal party') that could be inflammatory and harmful. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of AOC; it engages in a personal attack by accusing her of supporting genocide. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and does not seek to understand AOC's perspective or reasoning. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses ad hominem arguments and does not provide a constructive way forward. [-2]