Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically political discourse and media representation. The tone is critical of Angela Rye while praising Dr. Jill Stein and Butch Ware for their contributions to the conversation. The intent appears to be to highlight the perceived value of the interview and criticize certain media figures for their political stances.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies that Angela Rye's efforts were detrimental, which could be seen as a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does single out Angela Rye in a negative light, which could be seen as a minor violation of respecting dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and appreciation for Dr. Jill Stein and Butch Ware's perspectives, which aligns with promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism but rather criticizes Angela Rye without engaging in a dialogue, which is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express an opinion, which aligns with using the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.