In reply to:
Briahna Joy Gray
@briebriejoy
·
127d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive debate about political figures, their actions, and their impact on public issues. The tone of the statement is critical and somewhat accusatory, suggesting that one individual is attempting to undermine another out of insecurity.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it implies negative intentions and actions of another person, which can be harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others and can be seen as a form of cyberbullying or harassment by attributing malicious intent to another person. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it fosters division and animosity. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to a personal attack by suggesting the other person is acting out of insecurity. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.