Rashida Tlaib

Rank 6 of 47
|
Score 172

The statement addresses a significant public issue involving the actions of political leaders and a controversial incident, thus constituting public discourse. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to challenge the official narrative provided by President Biden and VP Harris regarding Ayşenur's murder. The content suggests a discrepancy between the official statements and the findings of an investigation by the Washington Post.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as inflammatory, potentially inciting strong reactions. It does not explicitly strive to do no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of Ayşenur by highlighting the injustice of her death. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by bringing attention to the alleged discrepancy between official statements and investigative findings. However, it lacks a tone of empathy and compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of public figures but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the actions and statements of President Biden and VP Harris. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to challenge official narratives responsibly, though the accusatory tone could be more balanced. [+1]