Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a broader discussion about the capabilities and limitations of AI models, specifically in the context of solving puzzles and understanding language. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, aiming to highlight perceived flaws in AI systems.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as dismissive of the efforts behind AI development.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity as it does not target individuals but rather critiques a technology. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on pointing out flaws in a somewhat mocking manner. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but does not do so constructively. It lacks suggestions for improvement and instead focuses on highlighting failures. [-1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   Not applicable as the statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to critique AI technology, which can be seen as contributing to public discourse on the topic. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech but could be more responsible and constructive in its critique.