Gary Marcus

Rank 23 of 47
|
Score 47

The statement criticizes the premature celebration of AI's problem-solving capabilities, using specific examples of errors made by AI in solving puzzles. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive, suggesting that those who support such AI systems should be embarrassed. The intent appears to be to caution against overestimating the current capabilities of AI and to promote a more measured and realistic view of AI's progress.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to prevent harm by cautioning against overestimating AI capabilities, which could lead to unrealistic expectations and potential misuse. However, the tone is harsh and could be seen as dismissive of those who support AI advancements. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it suggests that those who liked the tweet should be embarrassed. This could be seen as a form of public shaming. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a critical and somewhat mocking tone towards those who support AI advancements. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism. While it raises valid points about the limitations of AI, it does so in a way that could be perceived as a personal attack on those who support AI advancements. [-2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes. It focuses on criticizing others without reflecting on any potential errors in its own argument.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to caution against overestimating AI capabilities, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by promoting a more realistic view of AI. However, the tone and approach could be more constructive. [+1]