Andrew Yang

The statement is a critique of Jeff Hurd's law firm and its political donors, suggesting they are involved in activities that could harm local interests in Colorado. The speaker contrasts this with their own stance of not taking corporate money and committing to protect local resources. The tone is critical and aims to highlight a perceived conflict of interest and promote the speaker's own values.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly harm with words and actions, but it does imply negative actions by Jeff Hurd's law firm and donors. This could be seen as a minor violation if the claims are not substantiated. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on criticizing actions rather than attacking individuals personally. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding of the speaker's position on protecting local resources, but it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more accusatory and does not invite discussion or provide evidence for the claims made. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The speaker uses their influence to advocate for the protection of local resources, which can be seen as a positive contribution to society. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to address public concerns, but the integrity of the claims could be questioned if not substantiated. [+1]