Subbarao Kambhampati (కంభంపాటి సుబ్బారావు)
@rao2z
·
342d
The statement and the accompanying conversation critique the pricing structure of the o1 API, particularly focusing on the cost of reasoning tokens. The tone is critical and somewhat humorous, using sarcasm and memes to highlight the perceived inefficiency and high cost of the service. The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a public issue related to the cost and accessibility of AI services.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but uses humor and sarcasm to make a point about the high costs, which could be seen as a form of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the pricing structure rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement uses humor to promote understanding of the issue, making it more relatable and engaging for the audience. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the pricing model, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on the issue at hand. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a public issue, potentially encouraging dialogue and consideration of more affordable pricing models for AI services. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.