Gary Marcus

The statement 'Good enough for government work' is a colloquial expression often used to imply that something meets a minimum standard of quality, but not necessarily a high one. In this context, it seems to be a lighthearted or sarcastic comment on the comparison between different text analysis tools, including Microsoft Word and a language model. The tone appears to be informal and somewhat critical, but not overtly harmful.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the phrase can be interpreted as dismissive or critical of government work, which might be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it could be seen as undermining the dignity of government work. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses a colloquial phrase that might be interpreted as dismissive. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a colloquial phrase that might be seen as a personal attack or an ad hominem argument against the quality of government work. [-1]