The statement critiques GPT-4's reasoning capabilities and cost-effectiveness, suggesting that it falls short of expectations and that users will soon look forward to GPT-5. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive, focusing on perceived shortcomings of the technology.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of the efforts behind GPT-4, potentially undermining the work of developers and researchers. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. However, it could be more respectful in its critique.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It focuses on criticism without acknowledging any positive aspects or efforts. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive feedback or engage in dialogue. It could be seen as a personal attack on the technology and its developers rather than a constructive critique. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.