In reply to:
Jade Cole
@JadeCole2112
·
345d
The statement is part of a conversation about being blocked on social media, which can be considered a public issue related to online interactions and digital communication. The tone is somewhat lighthearted and conversational, with a hint of sarcasm.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the context of discussing being blocked could be seen as potentially negative.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy to some extent but engages in a public discussion about being blocked, which could be seen as a form of indirect harassment. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on the social media dynamics. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a casual remark. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.