In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
349d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
349d
The statement by @olivia_p_walker constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue: the potential risks associated with the development and deployment of advanced AI models by OpenAI. The statement expresses concern over the lack of oversight and the potential increase in risk to humanity, which are substantive issues that contribute to civic dialogue.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm and risks associated with AI development, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the issue rather than engaging in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by raising awareness about the potential risks and encouraging others to consider the implications. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of OpenAI's practices and the lack of oversight, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to raise awareness about a significant societal issue, aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a critical public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.