Reposted by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the actions of the Michigan Attorney General's office in charging university protesters. The tone is concerned and critical, aiming to highlight perceived injustices and advocate for the rights of the protesters.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It expresses concern in a measured tone without inflammatory language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the actions of a public office rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting concerns about the charges against protesters, which can foster a dialogue about civil rights and law enforcement. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the Attorney General's office without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to advocate for the betterment of society by addressing what it perceives as an injustice and calling for public attention to the issue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses its platform responsibly to raise awareness about a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.