Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 115
9/14/2024, 3:58:34 AM
X
In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
361d
@GaryMarcus Just so we’re on the same page here, does the below accurately characterize how you define “Responsible AI:”
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
361d
Also: Microsoft, which has long given lip service to Responsible AI, and doesn’t appear to be concerned about the potentially elevate bioweapons risk.

Tells you all you need to know about their current state of mind.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
361d
⚠️What’s below is not a joke, and not a drill. Sam Altman can do whatever he wants, with almost no liability, and no oversight, internal or external, even if it puts humanity at risk.

⚠️No unelected leader should have that power.

The statement 'roughly so, sure' is a brief acknowledgment in response to a detailed definition of 'Responsible AI.' The context involves a discussion about the ethical considerations and potential risks associated with AI, particularly in relation to bioweapons. The statement itself is neutral and does not add substantive content to the discourse but indicates agreement with the provided definition.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is neutral in tone, neither promoting nor detracting from the discussion.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in any form of harassment or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement is neutral and does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but acknowledges the previous message, which is a form of engagement.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence neutrally, neither contributing significantly to the betterment of society nor causing harm.