Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
485d
👇 @Kasparov63 gets it: if a system can’t be trusted to play chess, it shouldn’t be trusted at all.
9/14/2024, 2:10:15 PM
X
In reply to:
Dino 🤖
@SsumarGroup
·
484d
@tpgoebel @GaryMarcus He is just pointing out exactly that. As you mentioned, incredible tech but the hype is very, very high still.
Tobias Goebel 🤔
@tpgoebel
·
484d
@SsumarGroup @GaryMarcus It wasn’t. I don’t understand @GaryMarcus’ obsession with showing us examples of things this tech wasn’t built for.
Dino 🤖
@SsumarGroup
·
484d
@GaryMarcus 🤔 but the idea was not to LLM everything?…😂😂
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
485d
Amazing! And I bet it cost only a tiny bit more than a pocket calculator doing the same thing 1000 times faster.
Bindu Reddy
@bindureddy
·
485d
Behold! the power of magic intelligence 😂🍓

The statement and the preceding conversation constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about the capabilities and limitations of AI technology, specifically in the context of AI's performance in tasks like chess and its broader implications. The tone is analytical and critical, aiming to highlight the current limitations of AI systems and the potential risks associated with over-reliance on them.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and conversation do not appear to cause harm. They focus on the technical limitations of AI, which is a constructive critique. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The discussion promotes understanding by providing specific examples of AI limitations, fostering a more informed perspective on AI capabilities. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation engages in constructive criticism and dialogue. It does not involve personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the technology itself. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The participants use their influence to better society by raising awareness about the limitations and potential risks of AI, encouraging a more cautious and informed approach to its use. [+2]