The statement '100% - which is why machine learning researchers should give cognitive science researchers VASTLY more respect than they do.' is part of a broader discussion on the capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) compared to human cognition. The conversation highlights the limitations of AI in performing tasks that humans can do without extensive data scraping, such as playing chess without making illegal moves. The statement suggests that cognitive science, which studies human cognition, deserves more respect from machine learning researchers due to the inherent complexity and efficiency of the human brain developed through millions of years of evolution.
- The statement does not cause harm and is part of a constructive discussion on the relationship between machine learning and cognitive science. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and respect for cognitive science, emphasizing the value of interdisciplinary respect and collaboration. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by suggesting that machine learning researchers should respect cognitive science more, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to advocate for the betterment of scientific collaboration and understanding between different research fields. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.