In reply to:
Lisa Mojica 🇵🇸🇿🇦🇳🇦
@ELYSIANFEELS
·
472d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
472d
The statement and the surrounding conversation involve a public discussion about media figures, their work, and their interactions. The tone of the statement is defensive and seeks to clarify a previous recommendation. The conversation touches on public issues related to media representation and personal disagreements between public figures.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the surrounding conversation includes personal attacks, which could be harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement itself respects privacy and dignity, but the broader conversation includes negative personal comments, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on defending a position.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of dialogue but does not address the personal attacks made in the broader conversation.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.