Matt Taibbi

Rank 23 of 47
|
Score 18
9/14/2024, 4:15:06 PM
X
In reply to:
Coastal_Curmudgeon
@Erik_Naught_6
·
472d
@sermons_com @mtaibbi Lol, he just realized how lucrative the right wing gravy train was and ran with it
Sermons.com
@sermons_com
·
472d
@mtaibbi There’s an easy way.
There’s a hard way.
And there’s a sober way.

Taibbi chose sobriety.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
472d
Sam’s business model is to double the sycophancy of the average MSNBC host, to prove he can fill in if Lawrence O’Donnell falls into a manhole. Like a backup QB with half the talent but twice the effort.
Greg vs Crabitalism 🦀🇭🇷🇵🇸
@bigmadcrab
·
473d
Sam Seder explained today why he is no longer friends with Matt Taibbi after 20 years, and compares his turn which “broke his brain” to Glenn Greenwald apparently because Rachel Maddow won’t invite him on MSNBC

The statement in question, 'Name a “right wing” stance of mine,' is part of a broader conversation that involves public figures and their perceived political stances. This conversation touches on public issues and debates, particularly around media bias and political alignment, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It is a defensive response to an accusation, so it neither aligns with nor violates this principle significantly.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It is a request for clarification rather than an attack. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more defensive and confrontational in nature.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement seeks to engage in dialogue by asking for specifics, which can be seen as a form of constructive criticism. However, the tone is somewhat confrontational, which may not fully align with the principle of avoiding personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by asking for clarification rather than making baseless accusations. [+1]