The statement addresses a public issue related to the credibility and accountability of a public figure, Gary Marcus, in the context of public discourse on social media. It involves a defense against accusations of not admitting mistakes, which is a substantive engagement with the issue of accountability in public dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a defense against an accusation and does not use harmful language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the accusation directly and providing an example of admitting a mistake. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement explicitly acknowledges a mistake by mentioning the co-authored article about the Winograd Schemas problem, demonstrating a willingness to correct mistakes. [+2]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by addressing a public concern with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.