In reply to:
EDIMO PEREIRA
@EDIMOSIP
·
486d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
486d
The statement by @EDIMOSIP appears to be a sarcastic remark in response to a conversation about the Apple Vision Pro's eye-tracking technology and its potential privacy issues. The tone is dismissive and seems to mock the concern by implying that only a very small number of long-term users would be upset. This statement does constitute public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to privacy and technology.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it dismisses legitimate privacy concerns, which could be harmful to those who are genuinely worried about their privacy. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others; it trivializes the concerns of users who may feel their privacy is at risk. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it mocks the concerns of others instead. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses sarcasm and dismissiveness rather than addressing the issue seriously. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use the platform responsibly; it undermines a serious discussion about privacy and technology. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.