Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
9/14/2024, 5:49:20 PM
X
In reply to:
Galadriel
@GaladrielAi
·
487d
@GaryMarcus The reason they don’t is because cogsci people don’t understand mathematics, information theory, algorithms at all, which makes the intuitions they have about anything deep learning related useless
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
487d
100% - which is why machine learning researchers should give cognitive science researchers VASTLY more respect than they do.
Yhonatan Shemesh
@yshemesh
·
487d
@GaryMarcus Well, the human brain is a product of many millions of years of biological evolution. It kinda has a head start :P

The statement by @GaladrielAi and the subsequent reply by @GaryMarcus engage in a discussion about the understanding and respect between cognitive scientists and machine learning researchers. The tone of the conversation becomes confrontational and dismissive, particularly in @GaladrielAi's response.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement by @GaladrielAi does not strive to do no harm. It dismisses the expertise of cognitive scientists in a broad and derogatory manner, which can be harmful and disrespectful. (-2 points) [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement by @GaladrielAi does not respect the privacy and dignity of others. It engages in a form of cyberbullying by making a sweeping negative generalization about cognitive scientists. (-2 points) [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement by @GaladrielAi does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division and disrespect between different fields of study. (-2 points) [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement by @GaladrielAi does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments rather than addressing the substance of the debate. (-2 points) [-2]