Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Keith Ellison
@keithellison
·
475d
The statement engages in a political discussion about the reactions of Democrats to Jill Stein's third-party candidacy, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is analytical and somewhat critical, aiming to highlight perceived inconsistencies in political behavior.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does contribute to a polarized political environment. It neither significantly upholds nor violates this principle.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a respectful tone towards individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on political analysis and critique.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in political critique rather than personal attacks. It maintains a focus on political behavior and polling data rather than ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in political analysis responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.