Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -66

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a political debate about the record and actions of a public figure. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, suggesting that the recipient supports genocide. This type of language can be harmful and does not promote constructive dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions by using accusatory and inflammatory language. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it includes a serious accusation without evidence. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement fails to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion, instead opting for a confrontational approach. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it includes a personal attack rather than addressing the issues at hand. [-2]