In reply to:
Sillius Soddus 馃ゥ馃尨
@SilliusSoddus19
路
487d
The statement engages in a discussion about the capabilities of humans versus AI, particularly in the context of learning and data input. The tone is somewhat dismissive and critical of the argument that humans need vast amounts of data to become intelligent, suggesting that humans have historically become smart without internet access. The statement also critiques the relevance of certain technical metrics in evaluating intelligence.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a critique of an argument rather than a personal attack.聽[+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.聽[+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by contributing to the discussion on human versus AI intelligence, though it could be more constructive in its critique.聽[+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the argument presented by others. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.聽[+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.