In reply to:
Dianne Whitehead
@diannew314159
·
488d
The statement 'And he is surrounded with enablers that tell him everything is fine.' constitutes public discourse as it engages in a discussion about a public figure's mental health and the responsibility of those around him. The tone is critical and suggests a concern for the individual's well-being, but it also implies blame towards those around him.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies that others are enabling harmful behavior, which could be seen as a form of indirect harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the public figure to some extent but could be seen as contributing to a public narrative that might be considered cyberbullying or harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It focuses on blame rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and could be seen as a personal attack on the enablers. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.