Gary Marcus

The statement does not constitute public discourse as it is a sarcastic and hyperbolic response to a conversation that is more lighthearted and conversational in nature. It does not substantively engage with public issues, policies, or societal concerns.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses sarcasm and hyperbole, which could be seen as potentially harmful if taken seriously, but in this context, it seems more like a rhetorical device. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use a provocative and exaggerated claim.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more likely to provoke or mock. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a rhetorical question that could be seen as a personal attack or ad hominem argument. [-1]