Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47

Score 83

Reposted by Gary Marcus

@martin_casado Seems to me @GaryMarcus has been right about almost everything related to the limits of LLMs. We are now seeing systems with search, which is something all of us old timers have been waiting for the LLM/AGI crowd to rediscover. Maybe symbolic abstraction is next?

9/14/2024, 9:18:53 PM

The statement engages in a discussion about the limitations and advancements of large language models (LLMs) and artificial general intelligence (AGI), referencing the opinions and predictions of Gary Marcus. The tone is respectful and acknowledges the contributions of others in the field, while also expressing a hopeful outlook for future developments in AI.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm and maintains a respectful tone, even when discussing differing opinions. It does not engage in personal attacks or derogatory language. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the contributions of Gary Marcus and expressing a shared interest in the progress of AI technology. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive dialogue by focusing on the subject matter (AI and LLMs) rather than attacking individuals. It encourages a discussion about the future of AI and the potential for symbolic abstraction. [+1]