Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47

Score 83

Reposted by Gary Marcus

@SuperSalesAI @bbenzon @GaryMarcus @tdietterich It’s wild seeing people misstate his core ideas like this.

His main point is AGI is important and that LLMs aren’t a path to AGI.

His secondary point is that burning money on LLMs isn’t worth it without a path to profitability or AGI.

And he’s not wrong on either.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

490d

I am calling it:

👉 GPT-o1 makes for a a nice demo, but it ain’t reasoning

👉 It’s also too expensive to be practical

👉 In a few weeks everyone will be back to dreaming of GPT-5.

9/15/2024, 2:54:37 AM

The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the core ideas of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) and LLMs (Large Language Models), addressing misconceptions and clarifying the main points of a public figure's argument. The tone is corrective and aims to clarify misunderstandings in the ongoing debate about AI technologies.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on correcting misconceptions rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the core ideas and arguments related to AGI and LLMs. [+2]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the points of disagreement without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]