Carlos E. Perez
@IntuitMachine
·
489d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages substantively with the public issue of understanding the capabilities and limitations of large language models (LLMs) in artificial intelligence. The tone is assertive and the intent is to clarify a distinction in the discussion about LLMs' abilities to classify patterns versus reasoning over them.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is focused on a technical distinction rather than personal attacks or harmful rhetoric. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by clarifying a technical distinction, which can be seen as promoting empathy and compassion in the context of intellectual discourse. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing a technical point of disagreement without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by contributing to a meaningful discussion on the capabilities of LLMs. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.